Page 159 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

credit, it would be feasible that a “valid” inspection certificate 第三章 信用狀項下單據
may be presented and then be subj ect to rejection by the issuing

bank due to the wrong signator
依據信用狀之條款， 檢驗 y (ies) appearing thereon. ” 開 狀銀行所 存檔 之 指 示
證明未依
指
(
簽
編
之相關者
將依據 註： 開 狀銀行 樣 ) 簽 署 ，則 開 狀銀行拒絕該單據是合理的；簽字 ，信用狀對此是非 常 明確
審查
掌握
的； 總 之，信用狀之 開 發， 基 本上對於 作成 單據之 指 名之人並
未確認，此不符國際標 準 銀行實務且不被國際商會所認同；但
是，銀行選擇 讓購 此種信用狀，其 作 為將使其 承 受 風 險，除非
在單據之簽 署 錯誤時 ( 編 註：亦即因此被 開 狀銀行拒付 ) ，其將
擁 有對受益人之 追索 權。 “Given the terms of the credit, the
issuing bank would have been just ified in rejecting the documents

if the inspection certificate had
mandate held in its files. The cred not been signed according to the
it had been quite clear that the
signatures would be subject to a check against those held by the
issuing bank. However, the issuance of credits which do not, at the
very least, identify by name the individual (s) who are to complete

the document is not in line with international standard banking
practice and is discouraged by ICC. Banks who, nonetheless,

choose to negotiate such credits wo uld do so at their risk unless
recourse was held to the benefici ary in the event of the document

149