Page 43 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析暨最新案例研討

33

confronted with a court instruction not to pay, it is required to abide by such
decision or contest. The negotiating bank is, of course, at liberty to make any

representations to the court as it deems necessary in order to seek payment.”
2. 問題 2：依據 UCP600 第 12 條 a 項之規定，除指定銀行為保兌銀行外，任

何為兌付或讓購之授權並未加諸該指定銀行為兌付或讓購之任何義務。因
此，本問題之指定銀行通知此信用狀而未附加其保兌，則其無付款之義

務。“The nominated bank advised the credit without its confirmation. As such
it had no obligation to effect payment.”

3. 問題 3：依據 UCP600 第 14 條 a 項之規定，銀行須僅以單據為本。審查提
示以決定是否構成符合之提示；以及依據 UCP600 第 15 條 a 項之規定，若

開狀銀行決定提示係屬符合，該銀行須為兌付。因此，銀行是否兌付之依
據為提示是否相符，單據以外之理由 (例如：貨物之品質不符) 不得做為拒

絕付款之依據。因此，本問題中剩餘之款項須由開狀銀行支付，除非其已
收到法庭限制其兌付其承諾之命令。“The issuing bank. Unless it has been
12
served with a court order restricting its ability to honour its undertaking.”

四、信用狀與運送契約

（一）信用狀與運送契約之關聯性

在國際貿易，貨物之交運須經由運送人提供之運送服務，而規範

貨物運送作業者為運送契約，而實務上，在託運人 (通常為信用狀受

12 ICC Banking Commission Collected Opinions 1995-2001, ICC Banking Commission
Opinion No.R310,ICC Publication No.632 Jun. 2002. p.90-91