Page 207 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用
P. 207

單據,試問其拒絕單據之理由是否合理?                          第三章 信用狀項下單據

            【分析與結論】


                 依 照  所包含之    最低百    分  比  諸  如 “Profat: 45/46 percent. ”  及  低

               43 percent Protein
            於
                                 將予以拒絕等,
            限  ,即可接受之       最低   數  據,而依據此信用狀提示之單據應  這些  指  出此規定係為   最低
                                                                     屬反
            映個    別標   準  之實際    百  分  比  。  By the inclusion of minimum
            percentages such as Profat: 45/4  6 percent and rejectable below 43
            percent Protein, this indicates that these are the minimum, i.e.,

            lowest figures that are accept
            presented under the credit should re  able. The documents that are  flect the true percentage (s) of
            the individual criteria.

                 所提示之單據        (  發票及   SGS  證明  )   顯示裝運之    貨物   (  成份  )
            之實際    百  分  比  ,其  Profat  之  數 據為  45.56 percent  ,此已  高 於  最

            低
                                                         限
            數  之  45/46 percent  43.60 percent  -  45 percent  高  於 為實際之  最低  之拒絕標  ;而  Protein 準  。 “The   之
                                             43 percent
                                 ,此亦
               據為
            documents that were presented (i  nvoice and SGS Certificate) show
            the actual percentages in relation   to the goods shipped. The figure
            for Profat was shown as 45.   56 percent, which is above the

            minimum of 45/46 percent-45 pe  rcent being the true minimum.
            The Protein figure is 43.60 per  cent, which again is above the



                                                                     197
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212