Page 196 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

信用狀交易糾紛解析

【分析】

前述兩項拒付理由 說 明如下：

專家小
1.
編
為理由拒絕單據係 組 一 致 之意見為， 屬 合理；惟本案相對人 基 本上以 匯 票上 ( 大小 註： 寫 金額 不符
狀銀
指開
行 ) 所認定之 瑕疵 為一明顯之繕打錯誤，以此拒絕單據並不
合理，事實上，因為 four hundred forty seventy 之 金額 並不

存 在，其意 思 應為 four hundred forty seven ，此則 與 小 寫 金
額 及所提示之其 他 信用狀項下單據之 金額 一 致 。 The experts
are of the unanimous opinion that, while as a matter of

principle a difference in the dr aft between the amount in figures
discrepancy that justifies the
and the amount in letters is a
rejection of the document, in th e case at hand the discrepancy
identified by the Respondent is an obvious typographical error
that does not justify the reject

because the amount four hundred ion of the documents. Indeed, forty seventy does not exist,
it should be considered as me aning four hundred forty seven,

which conforms to the amount in figures and to the amount
indicated on the remaining doc uments presented under the
documentary credit.

186