Page 224 - 進出口貿易與押匯實務疑難問題解析-首篇 (增修訂二版)

208 進出口貿易與押匯實務疑難問題解析 (首篇)

有關詢問拒付理由是否妥當，請參閱下列國際商會的分析與意見

國際商會之分析與意見：
From the information provided, the documentary credit was split into (at least)

three distinct areas：(1) documents required, (2) additional conditions, and (3)

instructions to the negotiating bank. The condition that all documents must be
marked with the credit number can only relate to the information contained it areas 1

& 2 as described above.The instructions to the negotiating bank relates to the
manner in which it is to send documents to the issuing bank, and is not subject to

other terms and conditions expressed in the credit.
In these circumstances, it is not to be deemed a discrepancy that the courier

receipt accompanying the negotiating bank’s presentation of documents omitted the
documentary credit number.

-ICC Publication No.596, Feb.1999, R298
中譯：

國際商會之分析與意見：
就信用狀所提供的內容來說，可分為 (至少) 三個部分：(1) 所要求的單

據，(2) 其他條款，(3) 對押匯行的指示。信用狀要求註明信用狀號碼的單
據，僅指上述 1 及 2 部分。

至於開狀行對押匯行的寄單指示，並不算是信用狀所欲單據化的條款。

據此，押匯行寄單提示時所附的快遞收據未註明信用狀號碼，並不視為
瑕疵。