Page 193 - 進出口貿易與押匯實務疑難問題解析-首篇 (增修訂二版)

第四章 信用狀 177

Name Shown in the Credit as the Ultimate Receiver of the Goods. Where a Credit
Requires the Bill of Lading to be Issued to Order of the Issuing Bank, It Would Not,

Once Again, be Unreasonable to Expect the Certificate of Origin to Show the
Ultimate Receiver of the Goods as the Consignee.

Unless the Credit Stated Otherwise, Certificate of Origin Issued as Described
Above Would be Acceptable.

意譯：
產地證明的格式中有一受貨人欄位。

假使信用狀要求提示不記名式提單或空白背書提單，產地證明上的受貨
人欄註明為信用狀申請人，或信用狀所述最終收貨人，並無不妥。如果提單

依信用狀指示記名給開狀銀行，產地證明上以最終收貨人為受貨人也合情
理。

除非信用狀另有其他規定，則前述之產地證明是可以接受的。
又 ISBP (2007) 規定：

原文：184. Consignee information，if shown, must not be in conflict with the

consignee information in the transport document. However, if a credit requires a
transport document to be issued“to order”,“to the order of shipper”,“to order of the

issuing bank”or“consigned to the issuing bank”, the certificate of origin may show
the applicant of the credit, or another party named therein, as consignee. If a credit

has been transferred, the name of the first beneficiary as consignee would also be
acceptable.

意譯：
184.受貨人之資訊，如經顯示，則絕不可與運送單據上受貨人之資訊相

牴觸。但如信用狀要求運送單據做成「憑指示」(to order)、「憑託運人之指
示」(to order of shipper)、「憑開狀銀行之指示」(to order of the issuing bank)，