Page 117 - 進出口貿易與押匯實務疑難問題解析-首篇 (增修訂二版)

第四章 信用狀 101

Article 26 (UCP500) places no obligation on the part of the issuer of the
multimodal transport document to specify the modes of transport used. On the

basis that the credit required the presentation of a multimodal transport
document and such document Complied with the provision of Article 26

(UCP500) and the terms specified in the letter of Credit, a bank is not required
to seek confirmation that more than one mode of Shipment was effected.

中譯如下：
信用狀統一慣例 (UCP500) 第 26 條未規定複合運送單據簽發人須

表明其所使用的運輸方式的義務，基於此信用狀係要求複合運送單據
的提示，而此單據已符合信用狀統一慣例 (UCP500) 第 26 條之條款及

信用狀之規定，銀行不須確認其運送係以超過一種以上的運輸方式為
之。

國際商會又在 ISBP (2007) 第 68 項解說如下
68. If a credit requires presentation of a transport document covering

transportation utilizing at least two modes of transport (multimodal or

combined transport document), and if the transport document clearly shows
that it covers a shipment from the place of taking in charge or port, airport or

place of loading to the place of final destination mentioned in the credit, UCP
600 article 19 is applicable. In such circumstances, the transport document

must not indicate that shipment or dispatch has been effected by only one
mode of transport, but it may be silent regarding the modes of transport

utilized.
中譯如下：

68.若信用狀要求提示涵蓋使用至少兩種運送方式為運輸之運送單
據 (複合或聯合運送單據)，且若運送單據清楚顯示其涵蓋自信狀規定之