Page 66 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

信用狀交易糾紛解析

reimburse-ment condition that had not been fully studied
for its possible implications. The beneficiary by effecting

shipment thereunder agreed
specified and the associated risks. to the term of payment

The issuance of this type of credit is one that the ICC
actively discourages, as it undermines the responsibilities
of the issuer as defined in UCP and offers the beneficiary

little or no security. ”
－ ICC Banking Commission Unpublished Opinions 1995-

P.32-33 2004, R511 (TA60), ICC Publication No.660, June. 2005;
“This type of clause will typically be seen on credits for
：
十一
註
which the transferring bank has not added its
confirmation,. It is more a statement highlighting the

position of the transferring bank as a nominated bank in
line with sub-Article 10 (c) of UCP500, rather than the
bank’s position under Article 48. Sub-Article 48 (c) is

there to demonstrate that whilst a bank may be
nominated to transfer, it is under no obligation to do so.

(Opinion R.482) ” － Transferable credits and the
UCP500: Commission on Banking Technique and

56