Page 65 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

第一章 信用狀與信用狀統一慣例

discrepant. For example, a de scription of the merchandise
as “mashine” instead of “mac hine”---would not make the

document discrepant. However, a description as “model
123” instead of “model 321” would not be regarded as a －

typing error and would constitute a discrepancy.
ISBP.Paragraph 28, Intern ational Standard Banking
Practice, ICC Publication No.645. P.16

註 九： ． That this was a case where the wording of the credit had
not been fully studied and its implications realized.

． That such a letter of cred it provided no security and
should never have been issued.
That by using such a credit the beneficiary was fully
．

That advising this type of cr
edit was not a service to the
． responsible for the loss of the goods and the money.
banking industry.
－ Case Studies on Document ary Credit under UCP 500,
Case 1, ICC Publication No.535, June 1995., P.8-

9&P.104-105
註 十 ： “Reference in a credit to paym ent thereunder being linked

to the payment being received under another credit is not a
situation covered by sub-Article 13 (c). This is a

55