Page 352 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

信用狀交易糾紛解析

price to be made known to the applicant. There would be
no discrepancy for the reasons outline above. The

negotiating bank would not be required to produce any
proof of values that may ha ve appeared in the second

beneficiary (ies) invoice (s). ” 摘錄 自 Transferable
credits and the UCP500, answer of Issue 2 under sub-
Article 48 (i), ICC Commis sion on Banking Technique

and Practice, Oct. 30 2002.
註 十 六： “The documents, as received by Bank B, would appear

to have met the terms of the transferred credit. The
presentation of non- confor

substitution for those of the second beneficiary did not ming invoices and draft in
change the acceptability of the initial presentation. The

disposal of the documents (including the substituted
invoices and draft) should on ly have occurred with the
agreement of the first and se cond beneficiaries. On the

basis that the second benefi ciary’s documents conformed
to the transferred credit, Bank B should have acted in

accordance with the provisions of sub-Article 48 (i), and,
if necessary, utilized the se

edit. The main risk and
as good tender under the cr cond beneficiary’s documents
342