Page 347 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

第五章 信用狀轉讓與款項讓與

註六： “The transferring bank can reque (d) (iii). Sub-Article 9 (d) st, but cannot insist due to
the wording of sub-Article 9

cancel the original credit
(iii)
or a reduction in the value that … If a request is received to would affect the value of a

transferred credit, no agreement of the first beneficiary can
be acted upon until such ti me as the agreement of the
second beneficiary (ies) is received. ” 摘錄 自 Transferable

credits and the UCP500, answer of Issue 3 under sub-
Article 48 (d) ,ICC Commiss ion on Banking Technique

and Practice, Oct. 30 2002.
註七： “…If the transferred portion of a credit expires unutilised,

the first beneficiary may requ est the transferring bank to
transfer the unutilized portion to a new second beneficiary

as long as the original cr edit has not expired. The
transferring bank, however, should obtain explicit
confirmation from the original second beneficiary that he

has not utilized, or will not utilize, the available balance
under the transferred credit and request that the original

advice of the transferred credit be returned. Alternatively,
if the transferred credit was ad

beneficiary through another designated advising bank, the vised to the original second

337