Page 345 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

第五章 信用狀轉讓與款項讓與

註一： “The fact that a credit has been advised through a that it is the authorised
particular bank does not imply

transferring bank. ”
UCP500, answer of Issue 4 under sub-Article 48 (a) ,ICC 摘錄 自 Transferable credits and the

Commission on Banking Techni que and Practice, Oct. 30
2002.
註二： “However, this sub-Article cont ains no prohibition against

naming more than one transf erring bank if the issuing bank
is willing to do so. Providin g that the applicant, issuing

bank, confirming bank, benefi ciary, and transferring bank
agree to such a transfer, there

being incorporated into the terms and conditions of the is nothing to prevent it from
credit. However, the ICC discour 摘錄 自 Transferable credits and the UCP500, ages the issuance of such

transaction. ”
answer of Issue 2 under sub-Article 48 (a) ,ICC
Commission on Banking Techni que and Practice, Oct. 30

2002.
註三： “A bank that is nominated to transfer a credit is under no

obligation to effect a transfer and is able to indicate under
what conditions they would be willing to consider

effecting such transfer. ” 摘錄 自 Transferable credits and

335