Page 125 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

第二章 信用狀統一慣例與信用狀作業

opinion R.251 (appearing in ICC Publication No.596), a bank
requires to see some form of “linkage” between the documents

it terms. For example, a general
presented and/or the letter of cred
goods description or letter of cr edit number could achieve this.

The refusal wording would seem to indicate that the certificates
required a reference both to the cr edit and to the goods shipped,
whereas “linkage” may be achiev ed by a single statement or

wording on a document. The fact that the certificates were issued
by the named beneficiary does no t create a linkage as described

above. ”
對於 先 前單據之提示已 被 接受，後 續 之提示則 被 拒絕，信
用狀統一慣例並未規範，而不論該等單據係符合信用狀之規

定， 抑 或申請人 拋棄 瑕疵接受單據；如 R270 意見 ( 問題 2) 所表
示，此 題 材 涉 及 創 造先 例之 問題 ，依 照 一 般 銀行之 態度 ，此 種

先
宜創
之
性，但 例不 每 一交易與其前一交易係 立；此因， 就 單據之 屬 標準 而 言 ， 雖 有其 大 致相 外 同
於信用狀以
至
分立的，
因 素 ，僅供與 爭議 有關之法 院審 理時之 考量 。
“The UCP is silent with rega rd to documents that have
previously been accepted and a subsequent presentation has been

rejected, irrespective of whethe r the documents were found to
comply with the credit or were acceptable by virtue of an

1
15