Page 222 - 進出口外匯實務

進出口外匯實務

2. THERE IS NO ARTICLE IN
UCP500 FOR DOCUMENTARY
CREDITS SHOWING THAT
DELIVERY DATE ON CARGO
RECEIPT IS DEEMED TO BE
THE ISSUING DATE.
RGDS.
Trailer Orderis<MAC:><PAC:>
<CHK:> <TNG:> <ENC:>
<PDE:>
MAC:14BDAF9A
【註一】相關信用狀中有關 CARGO RECEIPT 之規定摘錄如下：
“+CARGO RECEITP INDICATING THIS CREDIT NO., DESC.
GOODS, INVOICE AMT. AND PLACE OF DELIVERY 20
WARD, TAN BINH DIST, HCMC, VIETNAM, AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY XYZ CORP. (WHOSE SIGNATURE MUST BE THE
。
SAME AS KEPT IN THE ISSUING BANK’S FILE)”
【註二】本案例開狀銀行之拒付主張毫無道理，所謂 CARGO RECEITP
之簽發日期， L/C 或 UCP500 並未規定，且 ISBP 未有此單據須
標示日期之意見，因此依據 UCP500 第 21 條 ( 註： UCP600 第
14 條 f 項 ) 之規定，銀行得照單收受；而押匯 / 寄單銀行亦應依
據第 21 條之規定，主張 L/C 未規定時，其有權利照單收受
等，據理抗辯。

212