Page 82 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

信用狀交易糾紛解析

【分析及結論】

UCP500 對此並無規範，理論上通 知 銀行應 遵照 開狀銀行

知
之
指
of the credit as instru 示為信用狀之通 cted by the issuing bank) (Advising bank should route the advices ；惟通 知 銀行辦理
信用狀通 知 時，於信用狀通 知 書上 加 註其處理之條款是 被允許
的，但 加 註信用狀之 動 用須經該銀行之條款並不能 改變 相關信

用狀之規定，即其 仍 應為開狀銀行所規定者，因此，該信用狀
之 動 用方 式仍 為自由讓 購 。
“An advice produced by an advi sing bank which is attached

to the text of the letter of cred it constitutes a statement of that
advising bank’s actions which ha

taken upon the presentation of documents. The content of an ve been taken and/or will be
advising bank’s letter cannot chan ge the terms of the underlying
credit, but an advising bank is

handling. Stating that the credit is allowed to state its terms of available with it by payment

does not change the terms of the underlying credit, which remain

as stated in the issuing bank’s advice. The credit would still be
available by negotiation with any bank. ” ( 註一 )

72