Page 323 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

第四章 信用狀其他作業

註一： ICC Banking Commission Unpublished Opinions 1995-
2004, R585, ICC Publication No.660, June. 2005; P.147

註二： ICC Banking Commission Coll ected Opinions 1995-2001,
R331, ICC Publication No.632 , June. 2002; P. 176-178

“There is no preclusion within UCP which would require
註三：
the beneficiary to present co mplete sets of documents per
individual transport document.

The credit allowed partial shipments, and therefore
shipment on two different vessels was permissible.

Provided that the information
(as a whole) met the terms contained in the documents
of the credit, there is no
justification for rejection. In these circumstances, the

period for presentation of
from the date of the first bill of lading. ” documents would commence － ICC Banking

Commission Collected Opinions 1995-2001, R368, ICC
Publication No.632, June. 2002; P.399-401
註四： ISBP paragraphs 20, ICC Pub lication No.645, Jan. 2003;

P.14
註 五 ： ISBP paragraphs 21, ICC Pub lication No.645, Jan. 2003;

P.14

313