Page 134 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

信用狀交易糾紛解析

obliged to check that the freight has actually been paid. Banks are
only required to check informat ion on the basis of that which

appears on the face. ”
問題 1 (b) & (c) – 倘提單註明運 費 已付及 顯 示 裝 運自

Singapore
已全程支付。 至 Chicago “If the bill of lading evidences freight paid and 經由任 何 西岸港 口，則銀行將 解 釋 為運 費
shows shipment from Singapore to Chicago via any West Coast

port, the interpretation of the bank s would be that freight has been
paid for the whole journey. ”

問題 2 – 如 同問題 1 (a) 所述，依據 UCP500 第 15 條，銀
行僅須 就 單據表面所 顯 示 審核資料 ，而無須經由一 被授 權之人
另
；
調
依據
用 查 其是否正確或 貿易條件並不 適當 恰 當 ，因為 問題 CFR 所述之貨物運送過程， 使
CFR
貿易條件之定義為：成
本、運 費 付 至指 定 目 的 港 ，應 使 用 CPT 貿易條件，因其定義
為運
only obliged to check the informatio 費 付 訖 至指 定 目 的 地 。 “As stated in 1a) above, banks are n that appears on the face of a
document without investigation as to whether it is correct or

placed there by an authorized pe rson. Article 15 of UCP500 refers.
Where the goods are being transpor ted in the manner in which you

describe, use of the Incoterm CF R is inappropriate, as CFR is
defined as Cost and Freight to a named port of destination. The

124