Page 183 - 信用狀交易糾紛解析-信用狀理論及UCP在信用狀作業之應用

“Paragraph 9 of ISBP states: “The authentication must show 第三章 信用狀項下單據
by whom the authentication has been made and include that

party’s signature or initials. If
been made by a party other than the issuer of the document, the the authentication appears to have

authentication must clearly show in which capacity that party is
authenticating the correction or a lteration. . ” This supports the
previous viewpoint expressed by the ICC Banking Commission.

Clearly, an insurance company’s chop, which includes the
company’s name, with an initial of the purported officer of the

e chop itself, complies with
insurance company embossed in th
international standard banking pr actice, as indeed would a chop
with the company name and a separa te chop or signature/initial of

the person making the alteration.
However, a chop with a numb er “3ABC” embossed therein

does not, on its face, evidence the name and capacity of the person
making the alteration. It is not for the bank to make assumptions,
and therefore this version would be discrepant. ”

問題二、 ISBP Paragraph 11 並未明定以不同字型、字 號 及
手 寫 製作完成 之單據，不能接受，其文義非 常 明確，即在此情

況下，並不視為變 更 或 更 改處，以此 方式製作 之單據，其接受
性須視 附 加 資料 之 形 式 及 方法 ，例如，由受益人簽發之單據，

173